Cedartown, GA · 4 min read

A city finance office switches vendors — and wishes it had done it sooner

Cedartown deliberated for months before changing payment providers. The transition took a fraction of the deliberation.

City of Cedartown

At a glance

Spent deliberating the switch
MonthsSpent deliberating the switch
Typical issue resolution time
HoursTypical issue resolution time
Transition, in the CFO's words
SmoothTransition, in the CFO's words

The challenge

Switching payment vendors is a risk decision, not a technology decision. A finance office that changes providers mid-year owns every consequence of a bad transition.

The deliberation was long precisely because the downside was concentrated: resident-facing disruption, reconciliation gaps, and a period where nobody trusts the numbers.

The approach

Implementation was sequenced so the existing channel remained available until the replacement was tested and staff were trained.

Government Window's team handled the integration work to the city's back-office system, keeping the burden off city IT.

Support was established as a direct line rather than a tiered escalation, so post-launch issues reach someone who can resolve them.

The results

The transition was described by the city's CFO as smooth and quick — the specific risk the office had spent months weighing.

Issues raised after go-live are typically handled within hours by the customer service team.

The office's summary of the experience is the sentence every vendor wants and few earn: it should have happened sooner.

Ready when you are

See what your jurisdiction's payment experience could look like

A 30-minute walkthrough of the platform against your departments, your business rules and your back-office system. No cost, no contract, no obligation.

No cost to the agency · No long-term contract · Live in days or weeks